Despite robust year-over-year growth in global semiconductor sales, a recent quarter-over-quarter decline indicates a potential market slowdown or return to normal levels. This dip suggests an underlying complexity masked by the strong annual figures.

Financially, key players are reporting divergent results, reflecting this duality. Firms deeply embedded in Artificial Intelligence (AI), High-Performance Computing (HPC), and Electric Vehicles (EVs) continue to show strength.

For instance, AMD projects a positive AI revenue outlook, and Onsemi reports resilient demand from EV manufacturers. However, this “selective boom” does not extend across all segments.

Stockpiling ahead of upcoming tariffs is creating a bullwhip effect

A critical short-term dynamic driven by tariff pressures is the phenomenon of “tariff front-loading” or “pre-tariff pull-ins,” where customers accelerate purchases to preempt impending trade restrictions or price hikes.

This indicates a shift from a more efficient “just-in-time” to a costlier “just-in-case” supply chain management approach, driven by uncertainty about predictable trade environments.

The “pre-tariff pull-ins” phenomenon is influencing current results. Inventec reported record April revenue, explicitly driven by customers stockpiling components ahead of potential tariffs, alongside strong server shipments. TSMC’s robust April revenue reflects this trend, and AMD’s stronger-than-expected Q2 forecast results from customers buying ahead of tariffs.

This stockpiling creates a bullwhip effect, artificially boosting short-term revenues but posing a significant risk of future demand lulls and inventory corrections. Such behavior indicates deep uncertainty about future trade policy stability, compelling companies into costly hedging that may not align with end-market demand.

Navigating the geopolitical and trade Maze

The semiconductor industry is at the center of geopolitical maneuvering, with trade tensions and national security considerations significantly reshaping supply chains and corporate strategies. U.S. export controls on advanced AI semiconductor technology, driven by national security concerns, have quantifiable impacts.

Strategic responses are multifaceted, notably involving substantial investments in supply chain localization and diversification. Huawei is aggressively pursuing self-sufficiency by constructing new domestic fabrication plants. Western counterparts such as Intel, Wistron, and Inventec are increasing their manufacturing footprints in the U.S. and Europe.

Companies like Nvidia have developed modified products for the Chinese market to navigate these restrictions, while lawmakers have proposed stricter tracking mechanisms. The industry faces heightened uncertainty, emphasizing the importance of strategic agility and risk management.

Furthermore, Nvidia is adapting to restrictions by planning the release of a downgraded H20 chip for China. The company is also exploring new markets, partnering with MediaTek on Arm-based PC processors.

This strategy aims to maintain market presence, although its competitiveness against emerging domestic Chinese AI chips, such as Huawei’s Ascend series, remains uncertain. Further tightening is anticipated, with proposed legislation aiming to track advanced AI chips, particularly to China.

Adding complexity, the Trump administration aims to replace the current tiered export rule with a “simpler” global licensing regime, though the long-term implications for stringency and predictability are unclear.

Beyond targeted controls, broader tariff policies pose significant headwinds. GlobalFoundries anticipates tariff headwinds in the second half of 2025, estimating an annualized cost impact of approximately $20 million. Infineon cut its full-year forecast, attributing the revision partly to ongoing tariff disputes and unfavorable exchange rates.

China’s SMIC warned of a potential Q2 revenue drop amid tariff uncertainty despite a strong Q1 possibly boosted by preemptive U.S. customer purchases. While SMIC later noted minimal direct tariff impact in Q1, the uncertainty weighs on its outlook. TSMC also acknowledges persistent tariff risks, noting that some of its recent strong performance is due to customer stockpiling.

Segmented financial performance

Recent financial reports paint a varied picture, often depending on a company’s exposure to high-demand segments versus broader markets susceptible to economic shifts and trade disputes.

Among foundries and integrated device manufacturers (IDMs), TSMC continues to demonstrate robust health, which is driven mainly by the demand for advanced AI chips. The company reported record consolidated revenue for April 2025, up significantly year-over-year.

This strong performance derives from customers rushing to secure components ahead of potential tariffs and demand for its advanced 3nm and 5nm process technologies for HPC and AI. TSMC projects a record second quarter but faces risks from a strengthening New Taiwan Dollar and persistent tariff uncertainties.

Intel’s foundry progress, including its 18A process and a reported Microsoft deal, favors its U.S. operations. GlobalFoundries saw modest Q1 2025 revenue growth but anticipates tariff headwinds.

SMIC experienced a Q1 profit and revenue surge with increased U.S. sales (likely pre-emptive buying) but forecasts a Q2 dip due to tariffs and yield issues, facing long-term advanced node challenges.

Infineon reported sequential Q2 revenue growth but lowered its full-year forecast due to tariffs and exchange rates. Onsemi exceeded Q1 revenue estimates despite auto tariffs, driven by SiC chip demand for EVs.

Supply chain partners like Inventec and Wistron are benefiting from strong AI server demand and pre-tariff pull-ins. They are also investing in U.S. manufacturing to mitigate tariff impacts and support clients. Distributor WT Microelectronics projects strong Q2 growth fueled by the AI and EV sectors, claiming minimal direct tariff impact.

This collective financial picture reveals a widening performance gap. Companies leveraging AI, HPC, and automotive generally post strong results for these segments, while others face greater vulnerability to tariffs and macroeconomic pressures.

Risk of market slowdown

Amidst the pockets of robust growth, many indicators and company statements point towards a tangible risk of a broader market slowdown.

GlobalFoundries warned of tariff headwinds in the second half of 2025 despite growth. Even aggregate data showing a quarter-over-quarter dip in global sales for Q1 2025, despite strong year-over-year figures, hints at a potential loss of momentum.

Geopolitical instability, particularly the US-China technological rivalry, creates an unpredictable business environment. The recent wave of inventory corrections following widespread pre-tariff pull-ins poses a significant risk, likely reducing new orders as customers work through accumulated stocks.

Furthermore, macroeconomic pressures in key regions, such as Europe’s year-over-year sales decline, cannot be ignored. Currency fluctuations and internal production challenges, like SMIC’s yield issues, also add to profitability challenges.

Counterbalancing these concerns is the persistent demand in high-growth sectors. The AI revolution continues to fuel demand for specialized processors from AMD, Nvidia, and Intel, as well as foundry services from TSMC. The transition to EVs drives demand for power semiconductors and SiC chips, benefiting companies like Onsemi.

It is plausible that the market is entering a “rolling readjustments” phase rather than a sharp, synchronized global downturn. Specific segments or regions might experience slowdowns influenced by their unique exposures to tariffs, inventory cycles, and demand drivers.

In conclusion, the semiconductor industry is navigating a period of profound change. While facing headwinds from trade protectionism, geopolitical friction, and macroeconomic uncertainty, the fundamental demand driven by digitization, AI, and electrification remains strong.

Success will depend on strategic agility, effective cost management, and continued innovation in this increasingly fragmented and uncertain global landscape. The “new normal” demands constant adaptation and heightened risk management.

By: DocMemory
Copyright © 2023 CST, Inc. All Rights Reserved